Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 205
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249668, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700860

Importance: Resident-to-resident aggression in assisted living facilities can result in physical and psychological harm, but its prevalence is unknown. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of resident-to-resident aggression, including physical, verbal, and sexual, among residents in assisted living facilities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used cross-sectional, observational data from a clinical trial, in which residents of assisted living facilities were monitored for events over a 1-month period. All residents of 14 large facilities randomly selected from 2 geographic locations (N = 1067), except those receiving hospice care (n = 11), were invited to participate; 93 died or moved prior to enrollment. There were 33 family and resident refusals; 930 residents were enrolled. Data were collected between May 30, 2018, and August 11, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The data are from a clinical trial testing the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce resident-to-resident aggression. In addition, the study was designed to assess prevalence using the Time 1 (baseline) data, using a probability sample of facilities to allow for this analysis. Resident-to-resident aggression was identified using a mixed-method, case-finding strategy involving 6 sources: (1) cognitively capable resident reports regarding 22 possible events, (2) direct care staff report, (3) staff member reports collected from event-reporting forms, (4) research assistant observation of events in real time, (5) facility accident or incident reports, and (6) resident records. Results: The prevalence of resident-to-resident aggression among the 930 participants (mean [SD] age, 88.0 [7.2] years; 738 women [79.4%]) during the past month was estimated to be 15.2% (141 of 930 residents; 95% CI, 12.1%-18.8%). The most common forms of aggression included verbal (11.2% [104 of 930 residents; 95% CI, 8.8%-14.2%]), physical (41 of 930 residents; 4.4% [95% CI, 3.1%-6.3%]), sexual (0.8% [7 of 930 residents; 95% CI, 0.4%-1.6%]), and other (70 of 930 residents; 7.5% [95% CI, 5.5%-10.2%]). These categories are not mutually exclusive as residents could be involved with more than 1 type of aggressive behavior. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional, observational prevalence study, resident-to-resident aggression in assisted living facilities was highly prevalent. Verbal aggression was the most common form, and physical aggression also occurred frequently. The effects of resident-to-resident aggression can be both morbid and mortal; therefore, intervention research is needed to prevent it and to treat it when it occurs.


Aggression , Assisted Living Facilities , Humans , Aggression/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Prevalence , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e248572, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669016

Importance: Evacuation has been found to be associated with adverse outcomes among nursing home residents during hurricanes, but the outcomes for assisted living (AL) residents remain unknown. Objective: To examine the association between evacuation and health care outcomes (ie, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home visits) among Florida AL residents exposed to Hurricane Irma. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using 2017 Medicare claims data. Participants were a cohort of Florida AL residents who were aged 65 years or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service, and resided in 9-digit zip codes corresponding to US assisted living communities with 25 or more beds on September 10, 2017, the day of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Propensity score matching was used to match evacuated residents to those that sheltered-in-place based on resident and AL characteristics. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to February 2024. Exposure: Whether the AL community evacuated or sheltered-in-place before Hurricane Irma made landfall. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty- and 90-day emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home admissions. Results: The study cohort included 25 130 Florida AL residents (mean [SD] age 81 [9] years); 3402 (13.5%) evacuated and 21 728 (86.5%) did not evacuate. The evacuated group had 2223 women (65.3%), and the group that sheltered-in-place had 14 556 women (67.0%). In the evacuated group, 42 residents (1.2%) were Black, 93 (2.7%) were Hispanic, and 3225 (94.8%) were White. In the group that sheltered in place, 490 residents (2.3%) were Black, 707 (3.3%) were Hispanic, and 20 212 (93.0%) were White. After 1:4 propensity score matching, when compared with sheltering-in-place, evacuation was associated with a 16% greater odds of emergency department visits (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .04) and 51% greater odds of nursing home visits (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00; P = .01) within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Hospitalization and mortality did not vary significantly by evacuation status within 30 or 90 days after the landfall date. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Florida AL residents, there was an increased risk of nursing home and emergency department visits within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall among residents from communities that evacuated before the storm when compared with residents from communities that sheltered-in-place. The stress and disruption caused by evacuation may yield poorer immediate health outcomes after a major storm for AL residents. Therefore, the potential benefits and harms of evacuating vs sheltering-in-place must be carefully considered when developing emergency planning and response.


Assisted Living Facilities , Cyclonic Storms , Humans , Cyclonic Storms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Aged , Florida , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , United States , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 70(1): 150-157, 2022 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523122

BACKGROUND: Assisted living facilities (ALFs) are plagued with quality issues but there are limited studies on the quality of ALFs. In Florida, state surveyors conduct inspections of ALFs and cite and/or fine facilities that are in violation of regulations. Yet, we do not know the types of quality problems identified and the extent to which facilities repeat such problems. In this study, we begin to fill this gap in our understanding of ALFs quality by summarizing the deficiency citations in Florida ALFs. METHODS: We obtained inspection citation data on 957 large ALFs (bed size ≥ 25) in Florida from 2012 to 2018. Citation data are summarized at the facility-year level and classified into different groups such as resident care, admissions, medication, staffing, and training. We examined the trends in citations over time and stratified citations by profit status, license type, and facility size. We also assessed repeat citations among the ALFs. RESULTS: Of the 957 large ALFs operating in Florida, 87% of the facilities were cited one or more times from 2012 to 2018. In 2018, the most common citations were related to medications (26.2%), resident care (25.3%), training (25.3%), admissions (21.1%), and staffing (20.8%). For-profit facilities, facilities with beds over 100, and facilities with limited mental health license tended to be cited more often across most types of deficiencies. Repeat citations are common with over 40% of facilities cited in two or more years for resident care and medication from 2012 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that repeat citations are common and ALFs do not improve quality on a long-term basis after citations. If we want to improve ALFs quality, we may need to provide appropriate incentives and resources to ALFs along with stringent enforcement of regulations.


Assisted Living Facilities/standards , Aged , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Florida , Humans , Quality Improvement , Quality of Health Care/standards
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 70(1): 8-18, 2022 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34449885

BACKGROUND: Limited COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare assistants (HCAs) may adversely impact older adults, who are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 infections. Our study objective was to evaluate the perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy in a sample of frontline HCAs, overall and by race and ethnicity. METHODS: An online survey was conducted from December 2020 to January 2021 through national e-mail listserv and private Facebook page for the National Association of Health Care Assistants. Responses from 155 HCAs, including certified nursing assistants, home health aides, certified medical assistants, and certified medication technicians, were included. A 27-item survey asked questions about experiences and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines, including how confident they were that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and adequately tested in people of color. Multivariable regression was used to identify associations with confidence in COVID-19 vaccines. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 155 completed responses. Among respondents, 23.9% were black and 8.4% Latino/a. Most respondents worked in the nursing home setting (53.5%), followed by hospitals (12.9%), assisted living (11.6%), and home care (10.3%). Respondents expressed low levels of confidence in COVID-19 vaccines, with fewer than 40% expressing at least moderate confidence in safety (38.1%), effectiveness (31.0%), or adequate testing in people of color (27.1%). Non-white respondents reported lower levels of confidence in adequate testing of vaccines compared to white respondents. In bivariate and adjusted models, respondents who gave more favorable scores of organizational leadership at their workplace expressed greater confidence in COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSION: Frontline HCAs reported low confidence in COVID-19 vaccines. Stronger organizational leadership in the workplace appears to be an important factor in influencing HCA's willingness to be vaccinated. Action is needed to enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this important population with employers playing an important role to build vaccine confidence and trust among employees.


Allied Health Personnel/psychology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Perception , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy
5.
CMAJ Open ; 9(3): E718-E727, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34257090

BACKGROUND: As in other jurisdictions, the demographics of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 changed in Quebec over the course of the first COVID-19 pandemic wave, and affected those living in residential care facilities (RCFs) disproportionately. We evaluated the association between clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, comparing those did or did not live in RCFs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series of all consecutive adults (≥ 18 yr) admitted to the Jewish General Hospital in Montréal with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from Mar. 4 to June 30, 2020, with in-hospital follow-up until Aug. 6, 2020. We collected patient demographics, comorbidities and outcomes (i.e., admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation and death) from medical and laboratory records and compared patients who did or did not live in public and private RCFs. We evaluated factors associated with the risk of in-hospital death with a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: In total, 656 patients were hospitalized between March and June 2020, including 303 patients who lived in RCFs and 353 patients who did not. The mean age was 72.9 (standard deviation 18.3) years (range 21 to 106 yr); 349 (53.2%) were female and 118 (18.0%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. The overall mortality rate was 23.8% (156/656), but was higher among patients living in RCFs (36.6% [111/303]) compared with those not living in RCFs (12.7% [45/353]). Increased risk of death was associated with age 80 years and older (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-4.24), male sex (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.41), the presence of 4 or more comorbidities (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.18-3.42) and living in an RCF (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.39). INTERPRETATION: During the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in Montréal, more than one-third of RCF residents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection died during hospitalization. Policies and practices that prevent future outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this setting must be implemented to prevent high mortality in this vulnerable population.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/trends , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Proportional Hazards Models , Quebec/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/mortality , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
7.
Public Health ; 194: 14-16, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33845273

OBJECTIVES: In large cities, where a large proportion of the population live in poverty and overcrowding, orders to stay home to comply with isolation requirements are difficult to fulfil. In this article, the use of alternative care sites (ACSs) for the isolation of patients with confirmed COVID-19 or persons under investigation (PUI) in the City of Buenos Aires during the first wave of COVID-19 are described. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. METHODS: All patients with COVID-19 and PUI with insufficient housing resources who could not comply with orders to stay home and who were considered at low clinical risk in the initial triage were referred to refurbished hotels in the City of Buenos Aires (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires [CABA]). ACSs were divided into those for confirmed COVID-19 patients and those for PUI. RESULTS: From March to August 2020, there were 58,143 reported cases of COVID-19 (13,829 of whom lived in slums) in the CABA. For COVID-19 positive cases, 62.1% (n = 8587) of those living in slums and 21.4% (n = 9498) of those living outside the slums were housed in an ACS. In total, 31.1% (n = 18,085) of confirmed COVID-19 cases were housed in ACSs. In addition, 7728 PUI were housed (3178 from the slums) in an ACS. The average length of stay was 9.0 ± 2.5 days for patients with COVID-19 and 1.6 ± 0.7 days for PUI. For the individuals who were housed in an ACS, 1314 (5.1%) had to be hospitalised, 56 were in critical care units (0.22%) and there were 27 deaths (0.1%), none during their stay in an ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, about one-third of all people with COVID-19 were referred to an ACS in the CABA. For slum dwellers, the proportion was >60%. The need for hospitalisation was low and severe clinical events were rare. This strategy reduced the pressure on hospitals so their efforts could be directed to patients with moderate-to-severe disease.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/therapy , Pandemics , Patient Isolation/methods , Adult , Argentina/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cities/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Poverty Areas
8.
Gerontology ; 67(1): 112-120, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33429388

BACKGROUND: Most evidence now indicates that cognitive function is related to poorer oral health in late adulthood, but that this relationship is not invariant across specific cognitive domains. Prospective memory (PM) is a core memory skill that refers to memory for future intentions and is known to be related to the formation of habits such as tooth flossing. However, the relationship between PM and oral health has been subject to only limited empirical study. OBJECTIVE: The two studies reported in this paper were designed to test whether PM is related to oral health in older adults of varying vulnerability status. METHODS: Study 1 sampled community-dwelling older adults (N = 172) living independently in the community; Study 2 sampled older adults living in a retirement village (N = 32). Participants in both studies were asked to complete a behavioural measure of PM, with their oral health indexed via self-report (Study 1) or an objective oral health exam (Study 2). RESULTS: In both studies, relationships emerged between event-based PM and oral health, with Study 2 showing that these relationships were specific to oral health measures of plaque and calculus. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults are particularly vulnerable to dental pathology, with important implications for their broader health and well-being. By showing that there is a relationship between oral health and a particular type of PM, this work will have potential implications for the development of more effective interventions focused on enhancing oral health outcomes in this group, such as those focused on strengthening habit formation.


Aging , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cognition , Diagnosis, Oral , Habits , Memory, Episodic , Oral Health , Aged , Aging/physiology , Aging/psychology , Correlation of Data , Diagnosis, Oral/methods , Diagnosis, Oral/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Independent Living/psychology , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Intention , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Self Report
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(5): 1231-1239, 2021 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33394506

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Care-partner support affects outcomes among assisted living (AL) residents. Yet, little is known about care-partner support and its effects on hospitalization during post-acute care transitions. This study examined the variation in care-partner support and its impact on hospitalizations among AL residents receiving Medicare home health (HH) services. DESIGN: Analysis of national data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare claims, Area Health Resources File, and the Social Deprivation Index File. SETTING: AL facilities and Medicare HH agencies in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 741,926 Medicare HH admissions of AL residents in 2017. MEASUREMENTS: Care-partner support during the HH admission was measured based on the type and frequency of assistance from AL staff in seven domains (i.e., activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADLs, medication administration, treatment, medical equipment, home safety, and transportation). Care-partner support in each domain was measured as "assistance not needed" (reference group), "Care-partner currently provides assistance," "care-partner need additional training/support to provide assistance" (i.e., inadequate care-partner support), and "care-partner unavailable/unlikely to provide assistance" (i.e., unavailable care-partner support). Outcome was time-to-hospitalization during the HH admission. RESULTS: Among the 741,926 Medicare HH admissions of AL residents, inadequate care-partner support was identified for all seven domains that ranged from 13.1% (for transportation) to 49.8% (for treatment), and care-partner support was unavailable from 0.9% (for transportation) to 11.0% (for treatment). In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for patient covariates and geography, compared with "assistance not needed", having inadequate and unavailable care-partner support was related to increased risk of hospitalization by 8.9% (treatment (hazard ratio (HR) =1.089, P < .001)) to 41.3% (medication administration (HR =1.413, P < .001)). CONCLUSION: For AL residents receiving HH services, having less care-partner support was related to increased risk of hospitalization, particularly regarding medication administration, medical equipment, and transportation/advocacy.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Transitional Care/statistics & numerical data , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicare , Social Support , Subacute Care/statistics & numerical data , United States
10.
Rehabil Nurs ; 46(1): 52-61, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657850

PURPOSE: Nursing home residents sit in wheelchairs (WCs) for extended periods, often with slumped posture. They often experience pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and pain. This study described WC seated posture with its selected predictors and outcomes in the nursing home environment, throughout the daytime hours of 1 day. DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study (n = 45) in two Veterans Administration Community Living Centers introduced a new measure of WC fit and described WC seated posture of older Veterans, with selected predictors and outcomes. FINDINGS: Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting, but not by level of sitting ability. Poor posture measured by the Seated Posture Scale was associated with pain. Highest interface pressures measurable were seen in peak pressure index (PPI = 200 mm Hg), indicating risk of pressure injury. Veterans often denied discomfort, possibly lowering overall pain scores, while reporting severe pain in specific body parts. CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting. Poor posture was associated with pain, and poor posture was an outcome of poor WC fit. Poor WC fit in this study supported earlier findings in non-Veterans Administration nursing homes.


Sitting Position , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Wheelchairs/adverse effects , Aged , Assisted Living Facilities/organization & administration , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Planning/methods , Community Health Planning/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/psychology
11.
Scand J Occup Ther ; 28(5): 354-365, 2021 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31714861

BACKGROUND: More than one in three older people in assisted living facilities suffer from loneliness that leads to adverse health outcomes. Group work may have the potential to improve residents' quality of life. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this feasibility study was to thoroughly describe a facilitated group process and compare its effects on cognitively impaired (n = 6) and cognitively intact (n = 7) lonely resident groups in assisted living facilities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used a closed, occupational therapy-oriented group model designed for lonely people. The study used a qualitative, multi-method approach. Material included individual and focus group interviews, observations and the facilitators' field diaries. RESULTS: Loneliness was reflected in diverse ways in both groups. Meaningful activities in mutual interaction played an important role in empowering the participants and enabling the development of the group process. Group processes had similar, parallel steps, from which the participants seemed to benefit. Surprisingly, the cognitively impaired group progressed towards self-direction more quickly than the cognitively intact group. CONCLUSIONS: A group process with clearly progressing steps revealed that lonely older people are capable of empowerment and self-direction - despite their frailty and cognitive impairment. Facilitators should be familiar with group processes to enable them to progress effectively.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Dysfunction/prevention & control , Loneliness/psychology , Occupational Therapy/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Finland , Focus Groups , Group Processes , Humans , Male
12.
Rehabil Nurs ; 46(3): 155-162, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33137008

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Function-Focused Care Checklist for Caregivers using Rasch analysis. DESIGN: This was a descriptive study using data from the study "Testing the Dissemination and Implementation of Function-Focused Care for Assisted Living Using the Evidence Integration Triangle." The study was approved by a university institutional review board. METHODS: A Rasch analysis was completed, which included 691 staff-resident observations from 85 assisted living facilities. FINDINGS: There was evidence of internal consistency (alpha coefficient of .93), construct validity except for a high OUTFIT statistic for wheelchair mobility, and hypothesis testing based on an increase in performance of function-focused care by caregivers over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provided psychometric support for the measure and guidance for revisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This measure can be used clinically to teach caregivers to provide function-focused care to residents in assisted living.


Activities of Daily Living , Caregivers/classification , Psychometrics/standards , Assisted Living Facilities/organization & administration , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(12): 2727-2734, 2020 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955107

OBJECTIVE: To describe variations in COVID-19 confirmed cases and deaths among assisted living (AL) residents and examine their associations with key AL characteristics. DESIGN: Observational study employing data on confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths in ALs from seven states, through May 29, 2020. SETTING: Information on COVID-19 cases/deaths in ALs was obtained from state government websites. A national inventory of ALs was used to identify communities with and without COVID-19 cases/deaths. Medicare Beneficiary Summary File identifying AL residents was employed to develop AL characteristics. County-level COVID-19 laboratory-confirmed cases/deaths were obtained from publicly available data. PARTICIPANTS: We found 4,865 ALs (2,647 COVID-19 cases and 777 deaths) in the seven states. After excluding missing data, the sample consisted of 3,994 ALs (82.1%) with 2,542 cases (96.0%) and 675 deaths (86.9%). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes were AL-level counts of cases and deaths. Covariates were AL characteristics and county-level confirmed COVID-19 cases/deaths. Multivariable two-part models determined the associations of independent variables with the likelihood of at least one case and death in the AL, and with the count of cases (deaths). RESULTS: State case fatality ranged from 3.32% in North Carolina to 9.26% in Connecticut, but for ALs in these states it was 12.89% and 31.59%, respectively. Among ALs with at least one case, midsize communities had fewer cases (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.829; P = .004) than small ALs. ALs with higher proportions of racial/ethnic minorities had more COVID-19 cases (IRR = 1.08; P < .001), as did communities with higher proportions of residents with dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ALs with a higher proportion of minorities had more COVID-19 cases. Many of the previously identified individual risk factors are also present in this vulnerable population. The impact of COVID-19 on ALs is as critical as that on nursing homes, and is worth equal attention from policy makers.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Comorbidity , Ethnicity , Female , Health Facility Size , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations
15.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(10): 2416-2419, 2020 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32614768

Our analysis of coronavirus disease prevalence in 9 long-term care facilities demonstrated a high proportion (40.7%) of asymptomatic infections among residents and staff members. Infection control measures in congregate settings should include mass testing-based strategies in concert with symptom screening for greater effectiveness in preventing the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Asymptomatic Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Skilled Nursing Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , California/epidemiology , Cities/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Household Work/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Maintenance/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Prevalence
17.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(7): 1504-1511, 2020 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32175594

OBJECTIVES: Almost 1 million older and disabled adults who require long-term care reside in assisted living (AL), approximately 40% of whom have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). States vary in their regulations specific to dementia care that may influence the presence of residents with ADRD in AL and their outcomes. The objectives of this study were to describe the state variability in the prevalence of ADRD among Medicare beneficiaries residing in larger (25+ bed) ALs and their healthcare utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective observational national study. PARTICIPANTS: National cohort of 293,336 Medicare fee-for-service enrollees residing in larger (25+ bed) ALs in 2016 and 2017 including 88,867 (30.3%) residents with ADRD. We compared this cohort's characteristics and healthcare utilization with that of individuals with ADRD who resided in nursing homes (NHs; n = 602,521) and the community (n = 2,074,420). METHODS: Medicare enrollment data, claims, and the NH Minimum Data Set were used to describe differences among ADRD patients in AL, NHs, and the community. We present rates of NH admission and hospitalization, by state, adjusting for age, sex, race, dual eligibility, and chronic conditions. RESULTS: The prevalence of ADRD among AL residents varied by state, ranging from 24% to 47%. In 2017, AL residents with ADRD had higher rates of NH admission than their community-dwelling counterparts (adjusted national average = 24%, ranging from 14% to 35% among states). AL residents with ADRD had higher rates of hospitalization (38%) than populations in either NHs (29%) or the community (34%), and ranged from 29% to 45% of residents among states. CONCLUSION: These findings have implications for states as they regulate AL and for healthcare professionals whose patients reside in AL. Future work is needed to understand specific elements of states' regulatory environments and local markets that may impact access and outcomes for this vulnerable population of residents with ADRD. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1504-1511, 2020.


Assisted Living Facilities , Dementia/epidemiology , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , State Government , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
18.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(6): 1218-1225, 2020 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32039474

OBJECTIVES: To examine variation in reported experiences with hospice care by setting. DESIGN: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospice (CAHPS®) Survey data from 2016 were analyzed. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine differences in measure scores by setting of care (home, nursing home [NH], hospital, freestanding hospice inpatient unit [IPU], and assisted living facility [ALF]). SETTING: A total of 2636 US hospices. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 311 635 primary caregivers of patients who died in hospice. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes were seven hospice quality measures, including five composite measures that assess aspects of hospice care important to patients and families, including hospice team communication, timeliness of care, treating family member with respect, symptom management, and emotional and spiritual support, and two global measures of the overall rating of the hospice and willingness to recommend it to friends and family. Analyses were adjusted for mode of survey administration and differences in case-mix between hospices. RESULTS: Caregivers of decedents who received hospice care in a NH reported significantly worse experiences than caregivers of those in the home for all measures. ALF scores were also significantly lower than home for all measures, except providing emotional and spiritual support. Differences in NH and ALF settings compared to home were particularly large for hospice team communication (ranging from -11 to -12 on a 0-100 scale) and getting help for symptoms (ranging from -7 to -10). Consistently across all care settings, hospice team communication, treating family member with respect, and providing emotional and spiritual support were most strongly associated with overall rating of care. CONCLUSIONS: Important opportunities exist to improve quality of hospice care in NHs and ALFs. Quality improvement and regulatory interventions targeting the NH and ALF settings are needed to ensure that all hospice decedents and their family receive high-quality, patient- and family-centered hospice care. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1218-1225, 2020.


Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Communication , Family , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Female , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
West J Nurs Res ; 42(10): 805-813, 2020 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32046616

Little is known about the psychosocial adjustment of older adults in the assisted living environment. A sense of belonging has been linked to psychological health and a lack of belonging could lead to loneliness. We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study to examine relationships between social engagement, sense of belonging, and psychological outcomes. Seventy female and 30 male assisted living residents participated. The mean age was 83.9 (range 65-99) years. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that older age, higher physical function, and greater sense of belonging were associated with fewer negative psychosocial outcomes (depression and loneliness) and that sense of belonging functioned as a mediator between social engagement and psychosocial outcomes. Additional work is needed to fully understand how sense of belonging and other factors influence psychosocial outcomes.


Psychology , Social Support , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Living Facilities/organization & administration , Assisted Living Facilities/standards , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/complications , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Latent Class Analysis , Loneliness/psychology , Male , Michigan
20.
Int J Med Inform ; 136: 104094, 2020 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32058264

INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that frailty, a geriatric syndrome associated with an increased risk of negative outcomes for older people, is highly prevalent among residents of residential aged care facilities (also called long term care facilities or nursing homes). However, progress on effective identification of frailty within residential care remains at an early stage, necessitating the development of new methods for accurate and efficient screening. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in accurately identifying frailty among residents aged 75 years and over in comparison with a calculated electronic Frailty Index (eFI) based on a routinely-collected residential aged care administrative data set drawn from 10 residential care facilities located in Queensland, Australia. A secondary objective included the identification of best-performing candidate algorithms. METHODS: We designed a frailty prediction system based on the eFI identification of frailty, allocating 84.5 % and 15.5 % of the data to training and test data sets respectively. We compared the performance of 18 specific scenarios to predict frailty against eFI based on unique combinations of three ML algorithms (support vector machines [SVM], decision trees [DT] and K-nearest neighbours [KNN]) and six cases (6, 10, 11, 14, 39 and 70 input variables). We calculated accuracy, percentage positive and negative agreement, sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa and Prevalence- and Bias- Adjusted Kappa (PABAK), table frequencies and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Of 592 eligible resident records, 500 were allocated to the training set and 92 to the test set. Three scenarios (10, 11 and 70 input variables), all based on SVM algorithm, returned overall accuracy above 75 %. CONCLUSIONS: There is some potential for AI techniques to contribute towards better frailty identification within residential care. However, potential benefits will need to be weighed against administrative burden, data quality concerns and presence of potential bias.


Artificial Intelligence , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Male , Queensland , Retrospective Studies
...